Security testing for healthtech products
We test patient portals, EHR integrations, and PHI data flows with an agreed scope and synthetic data, so you can assess exposure without disrupting care delivery. AI features and MCP integrations can be included in the same scoped engagement.
Coordinated test windows, careful methods, and clear evidence.
Where healthtech teams need clearer answers
Healthtech products have complex data paths and shared responsibilities. We focus on the questions reviewers ask most often and provide evidence that helps you close decisions without guesswork.
PHI data paths you can explain
We trace how patient data is created, stored, and exported, then document the access controls and boundary checks in plain language.
FHIR and HL7 integration scope
We test the agreed workflows and show which endpoints and permissions were exercised so partners and auditors see the boundaries clearly.
Patient portal access clarity
We validate authentication, session handling, and role paths with test accounts, and note what is in scope and out of scope.
Remediation that supports audits
Findings include evidence, impact context, and fix guidance so your team can justify priorities and close review cycles.
What We Test in Healthtech Products
Attackers often start with routine user paths—patient portals, provider workflows, and integrations—and look for places where access rules drift. We recreate those paths with test accounts and synthetic PHI so you can see how controls behave in real use.
PHI Access Boundaries
We trace how patient data is created, viewed, and exported across roles and care teams.
- Record access scoping across patients, providers, and staff roles
- Authorization on FHIR resources and bulk data endpoints
- Document and attachment access controls
- Export, print, and share workflows for PHI
EHR & Partner Integrations
We verify the trust boundaries between your product, EHRs, labs, and billing systems.
- OAuth scopes and consent enforcement for partner access
- HL7/FHIR interface authentication and input validation
- Webhook and event delivery verification
- Least-privilege service accounts for integration jobs
Patient Portal & Account Safety
We test the everyday flows patients and caregivers use to access care.
- Login, session, and MFA behavior under real usage
- Account recovery and identity proofing paths
- Messaging and appointment actions with role constraints
- Household and caregiver access controls
Remote Monitoring & Device Data
We evaluate the paths where device and sensor data enters the platform.
- Device enrollment and deprovisioning flows
- Data ingestion endpoints and validation
- Firmware or configuration update channels
- Isolation between devices, patients, and clinics
Example findings that support review-ready decisions
We document issues in the same language your reviewers use—what was exercised, what the evidence shows, and how to remediate without disrupting care workflows.
FHIR export scope expands beyond patient consent
Bulk export jobs accepted broader patient sets than the consented cohort when system roles were combined during off-hours workflows.
Resolution: Align export scopes to consent rules and log scope changes with evidence for audit review.
Caregiver access survives role change
Caregiver accounts retained access to prior patient records after role downgrades due to cached permissions.
Resolution: Invalidate cached permissions on role changes and verify access revocation with test accounts.
Portal session reuse across shared devices
Session handling allowed a second user on shared kiosks to reopen prior visit summaries without re-authentication.
Resolution: Shorten session lifetimes on shared device contexts and require re-authentication for record access.
Compliance evidence you can explain
We work within an agreed scope, use synthetic data, and coordinate test windows so care delivery is not disrupted. Findings are mapped to the HIPAA Security Rule and aligned frameworks with clear evidence of what was tested and what was out of scope.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you need access to real patient data?
No. We use synthetic data and test accounts that mirror real workflows. If a production validation is required, we coordinate access controls and limit activity to agreed paths without extracting PHI.
How do you define scope for EHR, FHIR, or HL7 integrations?
We agree on the specific endpoints, roles, and workflows to test, then document what is in scope and out of scope. Coverage notes in the report show exactly which integrations and permissions were exercised.
Can you work under a BAA and change-control process?
Yes. We can sign a BAA and align to your change-control requirements. Test windows are coordinated in advance, and we avoid disruptive testing unless it is explicitly approved.
What does the report include for compliance review?
You receive a clear scope statement, evidence for each finding, and remediation guidance. We also map relevant findings to the HIPAA Security Rule and note any related frameworks you need for review.
Safe next step
Explore a scoped healthtech assessment
without disrupting care workflows.
Share your product context and integrations. We will outline a safe test plan, confirm data handling needs, and provide fixed pricing if it fits.
Discuss a healthtech scopeor View a sample report first