They aligned the scope to our SOC 2 boundary up front and kept the evidence consistent. That made the auditor review straightforward.
SOC 2 penetration testing for your apps, APIs, and cloud stack
Testing is mapped to Trust Services Criteria with a fixed scope and coordinated windows. We keep it careful and non-disruptive, while giving you clear evidence for CC7.1 and related controls.
Make SOC 2 testing evidence unambiguous
Auditors need traceable evidence. Security teams need clarity on what was tested and why. We reduce ambiguity before testing begins.
⚠️ Where SOC 2 testing gets unclear
Ambiguity appears when scope, control mapping, and evidence are misaligned.
🧭
Scope drifts from the SOC 2 boundary
Testing targets generic assets instead of the services inside your SOC 2 boundary.
Impact: Coverage is harder to defend during audit review
🧾
Findings lack TSC mapping
Results are reported without clear links to CC7.1, CC7.2, and related criteria.
Impact: Teams must translate evidence for auditors
📌
Evidence formats vary
Reports miss consistent artifacts like steps, screenshots, and reproduction notes.
Impact: Stakeholders interpret results differently
✅ How we reduce ambiguity
We align scope, evidence, and control mapping from the start.
🧩
TSC-mapped scope
We agree on the SOC 2 boundary and map testing to the relevant Trust Services Criteria.
Outcome: Clear rationale for what was tested
🗂️
Auditor-ready evidence
Each finding includes steps, impact, and supporting artifacts.
Outcome: Easier internal review and audit response
🗓️
Coordinated testing window
A planned window with agreed change controls and communication.
Outcome: Predictable process that is easy to document
Credibility your auditors can reference
We have spent over a decade testing B2B SaaS products across apps, APIs, cloud, and identity. That work spans 700+ engagements across 150+ organizations, with a repeatable set of findings and fixes that map cleanly to SOC 2 expectations.
Our approach is visible before you engage. We publish research, share sample reporting, and contribute open source tools and training so your team can evaluate our depth without taking a leap of faith.
Teams preparing for SOC 2 use our documentation to show clear scope, evidence, and control alignment. It is designed to be reviewable internally and defensible in audit conversations.
Attack paths mapped to SOC 2 evidence
Attackers move from identity to access, then into APIs, data, and infrastructure. We test those paths against your SOC 2 boundary and map findings to the Trust Services Criteria so the evidence holds up in review.
Identity & Access Control
Most chains start with how users authenticate and how permissions are enforced. We validate the same paths with evidence-first testing.
- MFA coverage for administrative and sensitive roles
- Session handling across login, logout, and role changes
- Privilege changes verified with least-privilege checks
- Account recovery flows tested for bypasses
- Admin actions logged with actor and time
Application & API Abuse Paths
Attackers favor APIs and workflows where validation is inconsistent. We trace those paths and document the controls that hold.
- Authorization enforced on every endpoint
- Input validation on critical workflows
- Rate limits on sensitive operations
- Business-logic checks on high-risk flows
- Error responses avoid data leakage
Data Handling & Evidence
SOC 2 relies on clear evidence for how data is protected. We verify encryption, logging hygiene, and traceability.
- Sensitive data encrypted at rest and in transit
- PII or customer data access logged and reviewable
- Secrets and tokens excluded from logs
- Data retention and deletion controls documented
- Backups protected with access controls
Cloud & Change Controls
Infrastructure changes can open quiet paths. We test cloud and deployment controls that auditors expect to see.
- IAM roles follow least-privilege principles
- Public storage and exposed services reviewed
- Network segmentation aligns to the SOC 2 boundary
- Change approvals and deployment logs retained
- Monitoring alerts configured for high-risk events
Make SOC 2 testing defensible
Clear scope, mapped criteria, and consistent evidence make your results easier to explain and review.
✅ Defensible SOC 2 evidence includes:
🧭
Defined SOC 2 boundary and scope
Systems and data flows inside the SOC 2 boundary are explicitly listed before testing starts.
🧩
Trust Services Criteria mapping
Findings and evidence reference CC7.1, CC7.2, and related criteria where relevant.
🧾
Consistent evidence artifacts
Each finding includes steps, impact, and supporting artifacts that auditors can review.
⚠️ This testing does not claim:
⚪
Guaranteed audit outcomes
Testing supports your SOC 2 evidence package but does not guarantee audit results.
⚪
A complete compliance program
It validates technical paths and controls, not every policy or process requirement.
⚪
Continuous monitoring coverage
It reflects a coordinated testing window, not ongoing monitoring across the year.
How to present the evidence
🎯 Summarize scope and SOC 2 boundary in the test overview
🎯 List TSC mappings alongside each finding or control area
🎯 Attach supporting artifacts (screenshots, logs, or notes)
🎯 Document the testing window and change controls used
When additional testing is helpful
⚪ Major product changes since the last audit period
⚪ New external integrations touching customer data
⚪ Expanded public APIs or new customer-facing surfaces
⚪ Auditors request independent validation on a specific control
We can scope a focused follow-up test for those areas while keeping evidence aligned to your SOC 2 boundary.
Reinforced Confidence
Evidence teams can stand behind
Security and compliance leads value clear scope, mapped criteria, and consistent artifacts. That clarity makes SOC 2 testing easier to explain and simpler to defend in audit conversations.
Representative customers shown with permission. References available under NDA.
The mapping to Trust Services Criteria was clear in every finding. We did not have to translate results for our compliance team.
The report was calm and precise. It focused on evidence, not hype, which helped us defend our testing approach internally.
If you want a reference relevant to your audit context, we can arrange a quiet conversation under NDA.
Explore compliance evidence
Related compliance testing and reporting resources
Continue from framework-specific testing into evidence, reporting expectations, and adjacent compliance requirements.
Service
ISO 27001 Compliance Testing
Evidence-oriented testing mapped to certification needs, secure development, and vulnerability management controls.
Service
PCI DSS Compliance Testing
Internal and external pentesting for cardholder data environments with QSA-ready reporting.
Service
HIPAA Compliance Testing
Testing and documentation that supports evaluation of technical safeguards protecting ePHI.
Service
GDPR Compliance Testing
Security testing that supports Article 32 diligence, DPIA inputs, and defensible documentation.
Service
VAPT Reports, Pentest Attestations & Deliverables
See the format, evidence model, and deliverables buyers and auditors actually review after a pentest.
Guide
Sample Security Report
A redacted report preview showing executive summary, evidence, exploit narrative, and remediation guidance.
Service
Transparent Pentest Pricing
Estimate likely scope bands first, then confirm a fixed price during a short technical sync.
Safe next step
Review your SOC 2 scope,
then decide.
We can walk through your SOC 2 boundary, confirm what we would test, and share a fixed scope. No commitment required.
Schedule a SOC 2 scope reviewor See a sample SOC 2 report first
No obligation
Fixed scope and coordinated window
Evidence formatted for auditors