They aligned the test to our ISMS boundary and SoA from the start. Auditor questions were fewer and easier to answer.
ISO 27001 penetration testing, scoped to your certification boundary
We map testing to Annex A controls and agree the scope and window up front. The work is careful and non-disruptive, with evidence you can use during certification reviews.
Make ISO 27001 testing evidence unambiguous
Certification reviews rely on clear scope, Annex A mapping, and consistent evidence. We align those before testing begins.
⚠️ Where ISO 27001 testing gets unclear
Ambiguity shows up when the ISMS boundary, Statement of Applicability, and evidence do not line up.
🧭
Scope drifts from the ISMS boundary
Testing targets broad assets instead of the systems inside your certification boundary.
Impact: Evidence is harder to defend during auditor review
🧾
Findings lack Annex A mapping
Results are reported without clear links to your applicable Annex A controls or SoA decisions.
Impact: Teams must translate evidence for auditors
📌
Evidence artifacts vary
Reports miss consistent steps, screenshots, and reproduction notes.
Impact: Stakeholders interpret results differently
✅ How we reduce ambiguity
We align scope, control mapping, and evidence to your ISO 27001 context from day one.
🧩
SoA-aligned scope
We agree the ISMS boundary and map testing to the applicable Annex A controls.
Outcome: Clear rationale for what was tested
🗂️
Certification-ready evidence
Each finding includes steps, impact, and supporting artifacts.
Outcome: Easier internal review and audit response
🗓️
Coordinated testing window
A planned window with agreed change controls and communication.
Outcome: Predictable process that is easy to document
Credibility your auditors can reference
We have spent over a decade testing B2B SaaS products across applications, APIs, cloud, and identity. That work spans 700+ engagements across 150+ organizations, with a repeatable set of findings and fixes that map cleanly to ISO 27001 expectations.
Our approach is visible before you engage. We publish research, share sample reporting, and contribute open source tools and training so your team can evaluate our depth without taking a leap of faith.
Teams preparing for ISO 27001 use our documentation to show clear scope, Annex A mapping, and consistent evidence. It is designed to be reviewable internally and defensible in certification conversations.
Attack paths tested against your ISO 27001 boundary
Attackers start with identity, then move through applications, APIs, and cloud services to reach data. We test those paths within your ISMS boundary and map the evidence to relevant Annex A controls so the outcomes are certification-ready.
Identity & Access Control
Attack paths often begin with how users authenticate and how access is granted. We validate those controls with clear, reviewable evidence.
- MFA and SSO enforcement for privileged and sensitive roles
- Session handling across login, logout, and role changes
- Privilege escalation paths validated against least-privilege intent
- Account recovery flows tested for bypasses
- Administrative actions logged with actor and time
Applications & API Workflows
Attackers look for gaps in validation and authorization. We trace real workflows to confirm controls hold across the ISMS boundary.
- Authorization enforced on every endpoint and service
- Input validation on high-risk workflows
- Rate limits on sensitive or high-value operations
- Business-logic checks on approvals and transfers
- Error responses avoid data leakage
Data Protection & Evidence
ISO 27001 relies on demonstrable protection of information. We verify encryption, access logging, and traceability.
- Sensitive data encrypted at rest and in transit
- Access to confidential data logged and reviewable
- Secrets and tokens excluded from logs
- Data retention and deletion controls documented
- Backups protected with access controls
Cloud & Change Controls
Infrastructure changes can introduce quiet paths. We test cloud configuration and change controls tied to Annex A expectations.
- IAM roles follow least-privilege principles
- Public storage and exposed services reviewed
- Network segmentation aligns to the ISMS boundary
- Change approvals and deployment logs retained
- Monitoring alerts configured for high-risk events
Make ISO 27001 testing defensible
Clear scope, Annex A mapping, and consistent evidence make results easier to explain and review.
✅ Defensible ISO 27001 evidence includes:
🧭
Defined ISMS boundary and scope
Systems and data flows inside the ISMS boundary are explicitly listed before testing starts.
🧩
Annex A and SoA alignment
Findings and evidence reference applicable Annex A controls and Statement of Applicability decisions.
🧾
Consistent evidence artifacts
Each finding includes steps, impact, and supporting artifacts that reviewers can trace.
⚠️ This testing does not claim:
⚪
Guaranteed certification outcomes
Testing supports your ISO 27001 evidence package but does not guarantee certification results.
⚪
A complete ISMS audit
It validates technical paths and controls, not every policy, procedure, or governance requirement.
⚪
Continuous monitoring coverage
It reflects a coordinated testing window, not ongoing monitoring across the year.
How to present the evidence
🎯 Summarize the ISMS boundary and in-scope systems in the test overview
🎯 List Annex A mappings alongside each finding or control area
🎯 Attach supporting artifacts such as screenshots, logs, or notes
🎯 Document the testing window and change controls used
When additional testing is helpful
⚪ Major product changes since the last certification cycle
⚪ New external integrations touching sensitive data
⚪ Expanded public APIs or new customer-facing surfaces
⚪ Auditors request independent validation on a specific control
We can scope a focused follow-up test for those areas while keeping evidence aligned to your ISMS boundary.
Reinforced Confidence
Evidence your ISO 27001 reviewers can trust
Teams preparing for ISO 27001 value calm, mapped evidence. Clear scope, Annex A alignment, and consistent artifacts make certification reviews simpler and defensible.
Representative customers shown with permission. References available under NDA.
Every finding referenced Annex A controls, so our compliance team did not have to translate the results.
The evidence was consistent and calm. It helped us present the testing in a way our reviewers trusted.
If you want a reference at a similar certification stage, we can arrange a quiet call under NDA.
Explore compliance evidence
Related compliance testing and reporting resources
Continue from framework-specific testing into evidence, reporting expectations, and adjacent compliance requirements.
Service
SOC 2 Compliance Testing
Technical testing aligned to auditor expectations, with reports that support review and remediation tracking.
Service
PCI DSS Compliance Testing
Internal and external pentesting for cardholder data environments with QSA-ready reporting.
Service
HIPAA Compliance Testing
Testing and documentation that supports evaluation of technical safeguards protecting ePHI.
Service
GDPR Compliance Testing
Security testing that supports Article 32 diligence, DPIA inputs, and defensible documentation.
Service
VAPT Reports, Pentest Attestations & Deliverables
See the format, evidence model, and deliverables buyers and auditors actually review after a pentest.
Guide
Sample Security Report
A redacted report preview showing executive summary, evidence, exploit narrative, and remediation guidance.
Service
Transparent Pentest Pricing
Estimate likely scope bands first, then confirm a fixed price during a short technical sync.
Safe next step
Review your ISO 27001 scope,
then decide.
We can walk through your ISMS boundary, confirm what we would test, and share a fixed scope. No commitment required.
Schedule an ISO 27001 scope reviewor See a sample ISO 27001 report first
No obligation
Fixed scope and coordinated window
Evidence formatted for auditors